This has been a wild week. With Bishop Melvin Talbert conducting the marriage of two men in Alabama, to the 15th Anniversary of St. John’s UMC in Lubbock (my home church) celebrating a decade and a half as a reconciling congregation, back to Weatherford for All Saint’s Day services and then to Baltimore Friday and Saturday to hand out grant money to recipients of The General Commission on Religion and Race’s CORR Action Fund grants. Oh yeah, did I forget to mention the Judicial Council decisions were handed down too?
For those who don’t know, the Judicial Council is our denominations “Supreme Court.” Here is a detailed description of what the Council provides the Church:
“Is that resolution by General Conference in accord with The United Methodist Constitution?” “Was due process followed in that clergy trial?” “Did the bishop rule correctly on a point of law?”
Deciding questions like these is the work of nine men and women who sit on the United Methodist Judicial Council, sometimes referred to as our “Supreme Court.” The Council is at the apex of a carefully detailed chapter on judicial administration in the Book of Discipline.
Both clergy and laity serve on the Judicial Council-four of one, five of the other, alternating every eight years. Members are elected for eight-year terms by General Conference and may not serve on any other United Methodist Board or Agency beyond the Annual Conference. Members are limited as to two consecutive terms. The council elects its own president for a four-year term.
Presently, the court includes four lay and five clergy members, headed by William B. Lawrence, a clergyman from the North Texas Annual Conference. Other members are: Angela Brown, vice-president; F. Belton Joyner, Jr., secretary; Dennis Blackwell; Beth Capen; J. Kabamba Kiboko; Kathryn Austin Mahle; Ruben Reyes; and N. Oswald Tweh, Sr.
Lay members sometimes have a legal background and have included judges, a major corporation’s legal affairs vice president, a prominent figure in Illinois politics, and the first African-American mayor of Cincinnati.
The Judicial Council is required to review each decision on a point of law made by a bishop during an annual conference session. Other cases come from lower church courts, or from an official body of the church requesting a declaratory decision as to the legality of a particular action. There usually are several requests during General Conference for declaratory decisions.
The most difficult cases for the court are those involving the life and ministry of the clergy. Legal solutions may be simple, but applying them to specific cases is agonizing.
Decisions are based on the Constitution of The United Methodist Church and on the specific paragraphs of the Book of Discipline cited in a case, but may refer to other relevant paragraphs. Conflicting paragraphs must be resolved before a decision is reached. The Discipline instructs the court not to go “further than is necessary to decide the question of church law involved.”
Although there are sometimes open hearings on issues before the Judicial Council, deliberating sessions of the council are closed. The docket for each session is carried in advance by Interpreter magazine and Newscope, as are digests of decisions. Complete texts of decisions are posted on the official UMC website, printed in the General Minutes, and occasionally in compiled volumes.
(This text was adapted from an article by Robert Lear published in the Interpreter in 1996.)
Several of the opinions dealt with structure (and, as a result, funding) of Commissions, at the Annual Conference level, that General Conference 2012 tried to eliminate, at the Global level. And, of course, the seemingly ever present issue of LGBTQ full-inclusion.
What are your thoughts about events of this week?